1 |
Am Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:37:27 -0500 |
2 |
schrieb Tim <root@×××××××××××××××.com>: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Mihamina (R12y) Rakotomandimby wrote: |
5 |
> > Tim wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> >>>> So, I need a recent gentoo kernel (some 2.6.22 but I dont know |
8 |
> >>>> which exactly). I really want to use only ebuilds. |
9 |
> >>> Xen-sources doesn't go as high as .22 yet in the portage tree. The |
10 |
> >>> newest one is .20, but that should be okay for most people. |
11 |
> >> Xen actually made it in to the .23 mainline kernel, |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Do you mean xen will be directly in the kernel, the way alsa is? |
14 |
> > I did not see that great news on the Xen users ML. |
15 |
> > Have you got any reference? |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> That's exactly what I meant :) |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I got the news from kerneltrap.org[1], and the git commits are |
20 |
> directly viewable on git.kernel.org[2]. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> [1] http://kerneltrap.org/node/13917 |
23 |
> [2] |
24 |
> http://git.kernel.org/gitweb.cgi?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=5ead97c84fa7d63a6a7a2f4e9f18f452bd109045 |
25 |
|
26 |
I would note, however, that it's just the domU(?), meaning you can build |
27 |
Linux as a guest kernel. The dom0 stuff, however, which is required to |
28 |
build a hypervisor, is *not* in mainline. Your link states that in a |
29 |
comment, but I wanted to explicitly point it out. |
30 |
|
31 |
To quote kernelnewbies: |
32 |
|
33 |
"Xen |
34 |
|
35 |
Part of Xen has been merged. The support included in 2.6.23 will allow |
36 |
the kernel to boot in a paravirtualized environment under the Xen |
37 |
hypervisor. But support for the hypervisor is not included - this is |
38 |
only guest support, no dom0, no suspend/resume, no ballooning. It's |
39 |
based in the paravirt_ops infrastructure." |
40 |
|
41 |
I don't want anybody disappointed from the realization when they get to |
42 |
the kernel configuration with 2.6.23 ;). |