Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:22:54
Message-Id: loom.20150828T180532-197@post.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum by walt
1 walt <w41ter <at> gmail.com> writes:
2
3
4 > I avoided yesterday's downgrade from ncurses-6.0 to ncurses-5.9-r4
5 > because it was obviously(?) a mistake.
6
7 I believe you. But here's what I just experienced::
8
9 I syncd a few hours ago. Now when I just went to upgrade I got this
10 gyration of the latest ncurses debacle::
11
12
13 [ebuild U #] sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r5:0/5::gentoo [5.9-r4:0/0::gentoo]
14 [ebuild NS #] sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r99:5::gentoo [5.9-r4:0::gentoo]
15
16
17
18 OK so I masked off those to in package.mask.
19
20 I decided to up grade a few packages, one at a time. Upgrading openssl
21 got this response::
22 >>> Emerging (1 of 2) sys-libs/ncurses-6.0-r1::gentoo
23
24 and it is not stable nor has it been unmasked.
25
26 Something really funky/flunky be happening with ncurses (again).
27
28 Now look::
29 [ebuild NS ~] sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r101:5::gentoo
30 [ebuild NS ~] sys-libs/ncurses-6.0:5/6::gentoo
31
32
33 Surely I can mask off these updates and stay with ::
34 sys-libs/ncurses- 5.9-r4
35
36 For a while, till things settle a bit? Weird. I mask off a version
37 and a newer, later version appears. wtf?
38
39 > Who last updated ncurses, and why?
40
41 I believe you have 'hit the nail' dead center. Maybe a systemd requirement
42 perhaps? I do not know. I know, systemd is running git now?
43
44
45 James

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>