| 1 |
Am Mittwoch 09 November 2011, 16:19:53 schrieb Grant Edwards: |
| 2 |
> On 2011-11-09, Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Am Montag 07 November 2011, 10:28:41 schrieb J. Roeleveld: |
| 4 |
> >> On Sun, November 6, 2011 6:49 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> > Am Samstag 05 November 2011, 20:45:15 schrieb Joost Roeleveld: |
| 6 |
> >> >> Virtualbox has decent USB-pass-through support. Even quite high |
| 7 |
> >> >> performance. |
| 8 |
> >> >> |
| 9 |
> >> >> > Thanks for your help. I do appreciate it |
| 10 |
> >> > |
| 11 |
> >> > virtualbox is also pretty broken at the moment. |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> Broken in what way? |
| 14 |
> >> I am happily using it without any issues. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > the worst way: |
| 17 |
> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk5Mw |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> So some Linux developer thinks it's crap. Big deal. No matter what |
| 20 |
> you point at, there's a linux dev who thinks it's crap. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
yes, big deal. Because they don't 'think' it is crap, they have to deal with |
| 23 |
bug reports for distros, which are caused by virtualbox smashing around in |
| 24 |
memory. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
#163933 |
Archives