1 |
Am Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 06:26:14AM +0200 schrieb David Haller: |
2 |
> Hello, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2022, Dale wrote: |
5 |
> >Rich Freeman wrote: |
6 |
> >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 2:04 PM Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
7 |
> >>> |
8 |
> >>> Part. # Size Partition Type Partition Name |
9 |
> >>> 1007.0 KiB free space |
10 |
> >>> 1 9.1 TiB Linux filesystem 10Tb |
11 |
> >>> 1007.5 KiB free space |
12 |
> >>> |
13 |
> >>> |
14 |
> >>> I'm not sure why there seems to be two alignment spots. Is that |
15 |
> >>> normal? Already, there is almost 1TB lost somewhere. |
16 |
> >> 10 TB = 9.09495 TiB. You aren't missing much of anything. |
17 |
> [..] |
18 |
> Also, if you're using ext2/3/4, there's the preset, i.e. if you're |
19 |
> rather sure about what kind of data is going to be on there, you |
20 |
> can tune it so that it reserves more or less place for metadata like |
21 |
> inodes, which can be another bit. |
22 |
|
23 |
When I format a partition (and I usually use ext4, with some f2fs mingled in |
24 |
on flash bashed devices), I always set the inode count myself, because the |
25 |
default was always much too high. Like 15 m on a 40 GiB partition or so. My |
26 |
arch root partition has 2 m inodes in total, 34 % of which are in use for a |
27 |
full-fledged KDE setup. That’s sufficient. |
28 |
|
29 |
On Gentoo, I might give it some more for the ever-growing portage directory. |
30 |
But even a few percent on a 10 TB drive amount to many gigabytes. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Grüße | Greetings | Salut | Qapla’ |
34 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. |
35 |
|
36 |
A hammer is a wonderful tool, |
37 |
but it is plain unsuitable for cleaning windows. (SelfHTML forum) |