Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pet peeve: sending normal output to stderr (env-update)
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:04:01
Message-Id: 7573e9640611161256l35c93166rd51d90d9540b1803@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: pet peeve: sending normal output to stderr (env-update) by David Talkington
1 On 11/16/06, David Talkington <dtalk@××××××××××.org> wrote:
2 > Well and good, but this is not an abnormal message, and there's no
3 > reason for it to go to stderr. stderr is for errors, else it's just
4 > unbuffered stdout, which isn't terribly helpful.
5
6 Actually lots of programs use stderr for more than just "abnormal"
7 output. It is common practice in programs that generate a lot of
8 output to send the "verbose" messages to stdout and the status
9 messages to stderr.
10
11 But also, you might be interested in this:
12
13 http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-511285.html
14
15 I actually like this idea so much, I may try my hand at hacking
16 portage this weekend to make a proof-of-concept!
17
18 -Richard
19 --
20 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pet peeve: sending normal output to stderr (env-update) "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@××××.dk>