Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Fernando Rodriguez <frodriguez.developer@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OFF TOPIC] Qt Creator unable to access containers in debug mode
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:07:40
Message-Id: 2443368.0jsocI3Rm7@navi
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: [OFF TOPIC] Qt Creator unable to access containers in debug mode by Nikos Chantziaras
1 On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 9:32:07 PM Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
2 > On 24/03/15 21:12, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
3 > > On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 10:07:56 AM Francisco Ares wrote:
4 > >> Hi,
5 > >>
6 > >> Recently - but can't figure out exactly when - Qt Creator has become
7 unable
8 > >> to access Qt containers (where the STL ones work as expected) on the
9 debug
10 > >> panel. It shows <not accessible> in place of the expected item quantity
11 > >> for a QList, for instance, but for a std::vector<std::string>, it works,
12 > >> allowing inspection of all items.
13 > >>
14 > >> Any hints on what I may be doing wrong? The headers are all accessible,
15 for
16 > >> instance. Should I build Qt with debug symbols enabled, as recommended
17 for
18 > >> glibc?
19 > >>
20 > >> Using current Qt 4.8.5, Qt Creator 2.8.1, gdb 7.7.1, gcc 4.8.3
21 > >>
22 > >> Thanks!
23 > >> Francisco
24 > >
25 > > Try to print it from gdb cli, if it works you'll know the issue QtCreator,
26 > > otherwise you're likely missing some symbols. You should always compile
27 any
28 > > development libraries with debug symbols.
29 >
30 > You don't need debug symbols for inspecting containers. They are not
31 > needed. The only reason for enabling debug symbols in Qt is if you want
32 > to step into Qt's code.
33
34 Thank you. You do need symbols though, just not Qts for this specific case.
35 There are many reasons why you should compile your development libraries with
36 symbols besides stepping into the code. Such as getting a backtrace. Even
37 proprietary (closed-source) libraries often make the symbols available for
38 this reason.
39
40 --
41 Fernando Rodriguez

Replies