1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
Am 25.06.2011 10:09, schrieb Marc Joliet: |
4 |
> Am Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:12:26 -0700 |
5 |
> schrieb kashani <kashani-list@××××××××.net>: |
6 |
>> Because you responded to an existing thread you are not creating a new |
7 |
>> thread and thus and reducing the size of the audience that reads your |
8 |
>> email. Specially I'd have responded to "open source monitoring on |
9 |
>> gentoo", but since I deleted the Fortran thread in its boring entirety I |
10 |
>> didn't even see it until I saw a response further down the chain today. |
11 |
>> Whoever started Fbsplash did the same thing. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> For me, both of the threads you mention appear as their own threads (using |
14 |
> claws-mail). So I checked the email sources and could not find any "References" |
15 |
> headers in either of the thread parents. So, perhaps this is a bug in |
16 |
> Thunderbird? |
17 |
Fine here, too. |
18 |
Using mail-client/thunderbird-3.1.10. |
19 |
|
20 |
HTH, |
21 |
Enno |