From: | "Sebastian Beßler" <sebastian@××××××××××××.de> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-user] Why have a use-flag that can not be disabled? |
Date: | Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:54:06 |
Message-Id: | 4E09CE86.7050905@darkmetatron.de |
1 | Hello, |
2 | |
3 | atm I play with some use-flags and found that amarok has the flag player |
4 | that can not be disabled. |
5 | |
6 | #required by amarok (argument) |
7 | =media-sound/amarok-2.4.1 player |
8 | |
9 | If this flag is required at all costs, why make a flag at all? What good |
10 | is a switch that can not be toggled? |
11 | |
12 | Greetings |
13 | |
14 | Sebastian |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Why have a use-flag that can not be disabled? | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] Why have a use-flag that can not be disabled? | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
Re: [gentoo-user] Why have a use-flag that can not be disabled? | Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> |