1 |
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:17:41 -0500, Dale wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Just because something works for most people, doesn't mean it will for |
4 |
> everyone either. If you lose data, it doesn't matter. LVM just adds |
5 |
> one more layer of something to go wrong. Me, I don't need the extra |
6 |
> risk of having a system that doesn't boot and a loss of data. I'm sure |
7 |
> there are a lot of people that see it the way I do too. They just |
8 |
> don't need the extra risk. |
9 |
|
10 |
On the other hand, the OP needed a feature that LVM provides very well. |
11 |
If you don't need anything a product, be it software or a new fridge, |
12 |
provides, why bother with it? But that's not the case here. |
13 |
|
14 |
See "random" sig for further comment :-O |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Neil Bothwick |
19 |
|
20 |
"Good Enough" is the death knell of progress. |