1 |
Tanstaafl wrote: |
2 |
> On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mick<michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick<michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>>> All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to |
9 |
>>>> emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary. |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
> |
12 |
>>> Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on |
13 |
>>> my system but I haven't paid attention to temp space needed during the |
14 |
>>> emerge process. |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
> |
17 |
>> By about +3G may be more! |
18 |
>> |
19 |
> I think this is not so with the new 3.4.x versions... |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
This is so far. |
25 |
|
26 |
root@fireball / # du -shc /var/tmp/portage/app-office/ |
27 |
2.6G /var/tmp/portage/app-office/ |
28 |
2.6G total |
29 |
root@fireball / |
30 |
|
31 |
It's not done yet either. My /var is at 94% so I am moving some |
32 |
http-rep* stuff out of the way. One of these days, I'm just going to |
33 |
mount it on tmpfs and let it rip. lol |
34 |
|
35 |
Dale |
36 |
|
37 |
:-) :-) |