1 |
Alexander Skwar wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>Richard Fish schrieb: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
> |
7 |
>>So dm-crypt today provides the same level of security as loop-AES in |
8 |
>>single key mode, which as I already stated in a previous email, should |
9 |
>>be sufficient for most people. However, you did ask how it was |
10 |
>>insecure! :-) |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> |
13 |
> |
14 |
>Yep, I did ask and I wish to thank you for your explanation! |
15 |
> |
16 |
>If I understood you right, the statement that dm-crypt is insecure |
17 |
>is, as far as the usage pattern of most of the users will go, nothing |
18 |
>but FUD. |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
Yep, FUD, or based on very outdated information, as early versions of |
22 |
dm-crypt had the same vulnerability as cryptoloop. |
23 |
|
24 |
-Richard |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |