| 1 |
Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>Richard Fish schrieb: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>>So dm-crypt today provides the same level of security as loop-AES in |
| 8 |
>>single key mode, which as I already stated in a previous email, should |
| 9 |
>>be sufficient for most people. However, you did ask how it was |
| 10 |
>>insecure! :-) |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>Yep, I did ask and I wish to thank you for your explanation! |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>If I understood you right, the statement that dm-crypt is insecure |
| 17 |
>is, as far as the usage pattern of most of the users will go, nothing |
| 18 |
>but FUD. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Yep, FUD, or based on very outdated information, as early versions of |
| 22 |
dm-crypt had the same vulnerability as cryptoloop. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-Richard |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives