| 1 |
Bugzilla from en.ABCD@×××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> reQuiem23 wrote: |
| 7 |
>> hi all, |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> i just noticed some warnings in my bootup process. the order of the |
| 10 |
>> services |
| 11 |
>> in question is checkfs - localmount - fsck. however, checkfs does the |
| 12 |
>> pending file system checks already before the partitions are mounted, so |
| 13 |
>> why |
| 14 |
>> is there another service "fsck" which seems to do just the same? |
| 15 |
>> especially |
| 16 |
>> because my /home partition is already mounted by localmount when fsck |
| 17 |
>> starts, which is sort of a problem. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> Greetings, |
| 20 |
>> Niklas |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> It seems that you have a mixture of baselayout1 and baselayout2/openrc |
| 24 |
> scripts installed simultaneously, which can cause all kinds of problems |
| 25 |
> - - the service "checkfs" does not exist in baselayout2/openrc, and so can |
| 26 |
> be deleted (the reason it was not deleted is *probably* because it had |
| 27 |
> been edited at some point, and was therefore under CONFIG_PROTECT). You |
| 28 |
> may also be having other problems due to this, but that's the most |
| 29 |
> obvious that I can see from your description. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> - -- |
| 32 |
> ABCD |
| 33 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 35 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmGm9IACgkQOypDUo0oQOqG5gCgwHEBX0rrOIOg0xow/cY/9aTw |
| 38 |
> OVoAn1dmuy5NMq7EcN6Z2UEHh9wCUfsM |
| 39 |
> =V+2S |
| 40 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
hallo, thank you very much for the answer. i wouldn't now why checkfs should |
| 47 |
have been in CONFIG_PROTECT, because i have never touched it, but it is true |
| 48 |
that i had to update my openrc/baselayout. when i remove checkfs, though, it |
| 49 |
would not solve the problem of localmount being run before fsck, would it? |
| 50 |
the mounted /home part could still not be scanned, i suppose. am i wrong |
| 51 |
here? |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
Greetings, |
| 54 |
Niklas |
| 55 |
-- |
| 56 |
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/localmount-before-fsck%3A-e2fsck-complaining-tp21774767p21789277.html |
| 57 |
Sent from the gentoo-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
Archives