1 |
Matt Harrison wrote: |
2 |
> Heiko Nock wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 09:46:41PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>>> I've just read your outdated page |
6 |
>>> It is not outdated. Since more than a year, there is no visible |
7 |
>>> development |
8 |
>>> in cdrkit. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Not visible to you. cdrkit-1.1.8 at http://cdrkit.org/releases/ is |
11 |
>> dated 25.05.2008. It would be prudent for them to bring their website |
12 |
>> up-to-date, though. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>>> So I asume that they did not add new bugs. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> Maybe you should assume less and research more. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>>>> <http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/linux-dist.html>. Where you |
19 |
>>>> listed specific bugs, I see they don't affect me (and can't imagine |
20 |
>>>> they'd affect most users). Most of what you cite as bugs are just |
21 |
>>>> features they haven't implemented yet (and for all I know, they |
22 |
>>>> have since you wrote that page). |
23 |
>>> This is obviously FUD: Just because you don't already know that you |
24 |
>>> are affected does not mean that you are not affected. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> Of course not. Even the linux-kernel mailing-list hasn't seen your |
27 |
>> light, yet. |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>>> It would be fun to see you in 5 years after your then current OS |
30 |
>>> won't read your DVDs anymore because of the bugs in the filesystem |
31 |
>>> structure. |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> It would be fun if you would finally stop trolling forums, newsgroups |
34 |
>> and mailing-lists and keep your FUD and ego problems to yourself. You |
35 |
>> obviously take it as a personal insult that cdrtools was snubbed by |
36 |
>> some distributions and that somebody else is working on a replacement. |
37 |
>> Your constant ridicule and insults of a project you shouldn't care |
38 |
>> about at all is very telling, considering the alleged superiority of |
39 |
>> your own project. |
40 |
>> |
41 |
>> Thankfully, the GPL allows forks to eventually get rid of project |
42 |
>> leaders like you. |
43 |
>> |
44 |
> |
45 |
> I think it would be in everyone's best interests if we let this thread |
46 |
> die now, I've been reading this thread for the past 2 or 3 days and |
47 |
> frankly, it doesn't seem to be bringing anything of use to the ML. |
48 |
> |
49 |
> I don't want to get involved or takes anyone's side, but maybe the more |
50 |
> mature readers can just let it go :) I doubt anyone will miss any |
51 |
> benefit of this thread continuing. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Just want to help keep this list with its feet on the ground :) |
54 |
> |
55 |
> -- |
56 |
> Matt |
57 |
|
58 |
Sorry, maybe my reply was actually destined for the "CD ROM does not |
59 |
play audio CD's" thread, but I think it goes for both. |
60 |
|
61 |
*hides under a stone* |
62 |
|
63 |
-- |
64 |
Matt |
65 |
-- |
66 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |