| 1 |
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On Freitag 22 Mai 2009, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: |
| 5 |
>> > x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 won't compile due to a file conflict, |
| 6 |
>> > but portageq does not see it. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Probably because the ati-drivers you already have installed do not have this |
| 9 |
> file, either because they are an older version, or they did not create it |
| 10 |
> when compiling against the old x.org. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>> > Anybody know how to work around this? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>> yes, remove /usr/lib/opengl/ati/extensions/libglx.so it should be owned |
| 15 |
>> by ati-drivers, if not, some screw up happened. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Or use 'FEATURES=-collision-protect emerge ati-drivers'. I think I had the |
| 18 |
> same collision. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
>> /me wonders why there is still a stone old buggy ebuild/driver in |
| 21 |
>> 'stable'. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I was not able to compile newer ati-drivers with tuxonice-sources-2.6.28-r3. |
| 24 |
> Or ANY ati-drivers with a newer tuxonice kernel. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I thank you for the expert advice. I'm doing the emerge now, but even |
| 28 |
if it succeeds, I'm worried that the xorg-server will still own this |
| 29 |
file, since portageq seems to see that it does. This seems inherently |
| 30 |
wrong. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Sigh. I'm too far along to flinch now, so if this emerges, I'll |
| 33 |
probably restart X. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Wish me luck. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD |
Archives