| 1 |
Paul Hartman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Since the "new" xorg-server was a complete flop here, when will this |
| 5 |
>> devicekit option be coming? Please tell me it will be easier that hal is. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> It (xorg+hal/fdi config) has worked fine for me since day 1 (and |
| 9 |
> continues to work), using a fully ~amd64 system. So not a complete |
| 10 |
> flop. And xorg devs have been using it like that for something like 5 |
| 11 |
> years. I think the migration from one style of config to another was |
| 12 |
> more the cause of many people's problems generally. I don't know |
| 13 |
> anything about devicekit but I would bet the config & operation would |
| 14 |
> be close to that of hal/fdi than the old xorg.conf style. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I never said it was a flop for anyone else, just that it was a flop |
| 20 |
here. I couldn't get a GUI working until I went back to the old |
| 21 |
xorg-server and even recompiled a few other things. I masked that puppy |
| 22 |
and it will be masked for a while here. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Dale |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
:-) :-) |
Archives