From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs? | ||
Date: | Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:56:42 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120327235400.5bad3315@hactar.digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs? by Alan Mackenzie |
1 | On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:35:44 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Why is nobody else on this thread willing to take up its main point, the |
4 | > exact equivalence between the known, ugly, initramfs solution and the as |
5 | > yet half-baked idea of putting the same binaries into /sbin? |
6 | |
7 | Bewause everyone else realises they are in no way equivalent, or even |
8 | comparable? |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Neil Bothwick |
13 | |
14 | Access denied--nah nah na nah nah! |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |