Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: reader@×××××××.com
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: no suEXEC logging on errors
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 23:43:37
Message-Id: 87fyigr199.fsf@newsguy.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] no suEXEC logging on errors by Bertram Scharpf
1 Bertram Scharpf <lists@×××××××××××××××.de> writes:
2
3 > Hi,
4 >
5 > Am Mittwoch, 07. Jun 2006, 06:29:26 -0500 schrieb reader@×××××××.com:
6 >> I'm getting suexec errors in apache error_log. According to all
7 >> documentation on the subject .. suexec is supposed to log to:
8 >> /var/log/apache2/suexec_log
9 >>
10 >> and `suexec2 -V' shows that as well
11 >> -D AP_LOG_EXEC="/var/log/apache2/suexec_log"
12 >
13 > I experienced problems with suexec myself, too. In the end,
14 > I decided to compile it with the "no-suexec" USE flag ...
15
16 I'm not sure what this has to do with getting suexec working. Do you
17 just mean you gave up or what?
18
19 I solved my problem by changing permissions on /usr/sbin/suexec2 to
20 from:
21 -rws--x--- 1 root root 10880 May 31 15:09 /usr/sbin/suexec2
22 -rws--x--x 1 root root 10880 May 31 15:09 /usr/sbin/suexec2
23
24 That may not be the best way to do it. Hopefully someone who has more
25 experience will comment about it.
26
27 --
28 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: no suEXEC logging on errors "Jason A. Booth" <jbooth@××××××××××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: no suEXEC logging on errors Bertram Scharpf <lists@×××××××××××××××.de>