| 1 |
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: |
| 3 |
> > On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: |
| 5 |
> > > > fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the |
| 6 |
> > > > -p option |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > Just set fsck to 0 in fstab for xfs volumes. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > no, the thing is, -p for 'automatic check&repair' is just wrong. -a would |
| 11 |
> > be better. Because -a is understood by a lot more fscks. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > -p as prune/automatic repair is only understood by ext2/3 and reiserfsck. |
| 14 |
> > -a is there for a reason. A good one. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Both of them have no effect on fsck.xfs, because no matter what options |
| 17 |
> you give to a dummy, it will stay a dummy. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Bye... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Dirk |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
yeah, xfs is double fucked ;) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
but there are more fs than xfs, reiser(fs/4) and ext2/3. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
If you look into man fsck you find -a but not -p. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
So no matter what, -a is wrong and patching the tools instead of just |
| 30 |
replacing a letter is IMHO stupid&dangerous. |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives