1 |
Hi everyone, |
2 |
|
3 |
the recent hint made around here by Neil Bothwick (thank you, Neil) |
4 |
about --changed-use, which I hadn't been aware of, made me re-read `man |
5 |
portage`. I came across --complete-graph, which is news to me too. The |
6 |
manpage makes it sound like it's something I want, but I fail to get |
7 |
its precise purpose. I tried googling for an answer, but ... well, it's |
8 |
probably still a fresh feature. |
9 |
|
10 |
Could anyone please explain its function? I thought the -D in 'emerge |
11 |
-uDN world' was enough to ensure that all world packages and all their |
12 |
runtime deps (recursively) are considered and updated/remerged, if |
13 |
necessary. The manpage suggests that --complete-graph is different in |
14 |
that it doesn't actually pull in update/remerge of deep (i.e., deeper |
15 |
than immediate) deps of world packages. It just checks if any |
16 |
updates/remerges of world packages (plus their immediate deps) causes |
17 |
any conficts deeper in the depgraph. Is that all there is to the |
18 |
difference between --deep and --complete-graph? |
19 |
|
20 |
Thanks a lot for clarification. |
21 |
-rz |