Archives
Archives
| From: | Christoph Daldrup <cd-news@×××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] update portage vs update system | ||
| Date: | Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:58:22 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4300F2CC.9@gmx.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] update portage vs update system by maxim wexler |
||
| 1 | Am 08/15/2005 09:42 PM maxim wexler wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > At the end of a successful emerge --sync I was advised |
| 4 | > to "update portage". It didn't say but I assumed it |
| 5 | > meant "emerge update portage", which is what I did -- |
| 6 | > so far so good. But the manual only gives update |
| 7 | > system or world, no portage. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | An "emerge portage" should be fine. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Christoph |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] update portage vs update system | Fernando Meira <fmeira@×××××.com> |