| 1 |
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 5:57 AM, lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@×××××.com> writes: |
| 3 |
>> wrt symlinks, some legacy tools, and regular unix tools have a completely |
| 4 |
>> different behavior when traversing symlinks as opposed to regular |
| 5 |
>> directories, which bindmounts emulate. although in practice i imagine it |
| 6 |
>> wont affect him. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Which tools come to mind? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
As I mentioned earlier, I believe portage doesn't like it if /usr or |
| 12 |
/var are symlinks. But, I'm going from memory - it has been a while |
| 13 |
since I had to bind-mount them. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Rich |
Archives