| 1 |
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:51:23 +0100 |
| 2 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:47:06 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > > Why not post the details of it? All an initramfs is is an init |
| 7 |
> > > script and a few binaries. Extract the init script, the initramfs |
| 8 |
> > > file is a plain cpio archive, and post it here. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I did post it a week or so ago in another thread. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The init script? I didn't see it, which thread? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> > Yea, I know all that. They are breaking one thing to fix something |
| 15 |
> > else so that they don't have to deal with fixing what they broke. |
| 16 |
> > I got that a long time ago. ;-) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I'm coming round to the point of view that the breakage predates udev |
| 19 |
> by many years. The whole idea of having four directories for binaries |
| 20 |
> and two for libraries is an inelegance that I have come to accept |
| 21 |
> over the years but only because it is "the way we have always done it" |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
four and two? You're the lucky one. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I have six and three minimally on every server, plus however many the |
| 26 |
proprietary fellows felt like sticking in /opt.... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Alan McKinnnon |
| 31 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives