| 1 |
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 15:26:22 +0100, Kai Peter wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > The was a tool in portage this did this. I tried it but it did not |
| 4 |
> > work in the real world because you couldn't set a rule for generated |
| 5 |
> > passwords |
| 6 |
> > that matched the requirements of all sites, for example some require a |
| 7 |
> > non-alphanumeric character while other sites only allow alphanumerics. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > I can remember what the tools was called, although I'm pretty sure it |
| 10 |
> > was written in Python. I'd be interested to know how you get around |
| 11 |
> > the conflicting restrictions as this seems a good way to do things. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> By using an existing tool you have to live with its restrictions |
| 14 |
> always. But who says that it could not be done? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
It wasn't so much a restriction in the tool as the sites, which have |
| 17 |
conflicting requirements for passwords - especially the ones that have a |
| 18 |
MAXIMUM password length. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how it remains so popular? |
Archives