1 |
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:48:52PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: |
2 |
> I'm looking at going with... |
3 |
> |
4 |
> CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -mfpmath=sse -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-pic -fno-PIC -fno-pie -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables" |
5 |
> CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" |
6 |
|
7 |
Hmm ... is this really sufficient? In order to really not get a PIE |
8 |
compiled, doesn't one also has to tell the linker about it? Testing on |
9 |
a system that's already been upgraded to a GCC which produces PIEs by |
10 |
default: |
11 |
|
12 |
nils@boerne (GCC7) ~ $ gcc test.c |
13 |
nils@boerne (GCC7) ~ $ file a.out |
14 |
a.out: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, not stripped |
15 |
|
16 |
-> As expected, this is a PIE ("ELF 32-bit LSB shared object"). |
17 |
|
18 |
ils@boerne (GCC7) ~ $ gcc -fno-pie test.c |
19 |
nils@boerne (GCC7) ~ $ file a.out |
20 |
a.out: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, not stripped |
21 |
|
22 |
-> Despite "-fno-pie" being used, still a shared object / PIE. |
23 |
|
24 |
ils@boerne (GCC7) ~ $ gcc -fno-pie -no-pie test.c |
25 |
nils@boerne (GCC7) ~ $ file a.out |
26 |
a.out: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, not stripped |
27 |
|
28 |
-> Adding "-no-pie" to the game, and we get a normal "ELF 32-bit LSB |
29 |
executable" (i.e. non-PIE). |
30 |
|
31 |
So this might sound like you'd have to add "-no-pie" to your CFLAGS as |
32 |
well, however, when I have a look at this bug report: |
33 |
|
34 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77464 |
35 |
|
36 |
I get the feeling that this is just asking for trouble. |
37 |
|
38 |
Now, if I wanted to switch to a 17.0 profile, and still make sure |
39 |
everything stays the way it was before PIE-wise (i.e. binaries get |
40 |
compiled as non-PIE by default), I'd probably have a look instead at |
41 |
overriding the "pie" USE flag that the new profile forces on GCC. It |
42 |
should be able to set it to "-pie" in your local portage config. That |
43 |
way, GCC should continue to be build with "--disable-default-pie", |
44 |
which should make it emit normal non-PIE binaries by default, thus you |
45 |
wouldn't have to specify anything PIE-related in your CFLAGS to |
46 |
achieve just that. Might be the easier solution, I guess. |
47 |
|
48 |
Greetings |
49 |
Nils |