| 1 |
> |
| 2 |
> Somewhere in this thread was a mention of a failed patch. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Where version of patch are you using? If it's 2.6, downgrade it as 2.6 is |
| 5 |
> horribly broken |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2009/12/01/gentoo-service-announcement-keep-clear-of- |
| 8 |
> gnu-patch-2-6 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
There was some patching things that caught my eye related to redland. |
| 12 |
However, I found out that it was applied in both OO.o-3.0.0 and |
| 13 |
OO.o-3.1.1 and so I assumed it was not to blame. I can't remember if |
| 14 |
I actually posted about it in my brainstorming. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
In any case, I have not modified patch since dealing with the OO.o |
| 17 |
problems, and: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Calculating dependencies... done! |
| 20 |
[ebuild R ] sys-devel/patch-2.5.9 USE="-static" 0 kB |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Thanks for the notice, though. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
~daid |
Archives