| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 09/09/2013 02:07 PM, Mick wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Monday 09 Sep 2013 14:42:28 Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 09/09/2013 01:28 AM, Mick wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> Are you saying that 2048 RSA keys are no good anymore? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> They're probably fine, but when you're making them yourself, the |
| 10 |
>> extra bits are free. I would assume that the NSA can crack |
| 11 |
>> 1024-bit RSA[1], so why not jump to 4096 so you don't have to do |
| 12 |
>> this again in a few years? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Right, but my router won't work with keys larger than 2048 and its |
| 15 |
> admin GUI is controlled with 1024-bit public certificate. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
How often do you need to admin the router? Just do it from home (i.e. |
| 19 |
on the LAN side). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSLiCIAAoJEBxJck0inpOiOxUQAKLD/ZpyhmdbyKYhw8git9A9 |
| 25 |
omPhNJPrIiRFNiw2uS9RrdRTqNaoAQyzRy8QkyfQK5MxYqSR7Xf3YUFv/fNXiahS |
| 26 |
pT3wSi9OVmaJQ7p5yHkmEdPTp30nhg53kFFeZ6h2Qd1BQ9GmzCoq5ajPavLoIreF |
| 27 |
DMjpLAsE3fY+1JcMe1qbyqfrAGrfpVrh2h5VdMneIFe2t8/yRQKX5F/z6JWnb8/V |
| 28 |
pdHQfFkybnJOiul1aLy/C/wKKyHVcrFvpM8QwhfGuDVY/q9h9gg99QN/5KqtahfJ |
| 29 |
jAuzaygTcSHsYfxNzf83ik0O25RR7UJ/dW4YGbK+PCb11RQZ3i/scxkuW3y11DGS |
| 30 |
iFMT9bQAP8InqUi8lWawu5fNwJBGlMgbHIYbkzpd/9U2YSQBbjJJgyOczsLcL8cC |
| 31 |
S8F9i8LqhRW3w6IczSGq6rt51gFgSVpBNaysJprq95Ei3/ZoAZY/jcpKAZhlV0wS |
| 32 |
3xRCkiNBjPcyTHuSV5Z4QzgLB77EtO8fdV6vIBshY5zdX1jXFA8n5jKgb9tmTCKQ |
| 33 |
Eu6c1VvmJ4sIS437UgVcMVs7c08rp5qI3BhM1uKVuD/PIuQkaTnT6MZ57+AsvCjc |
| 34 |
hQ+tKaDhrnxY1aHkSwimtKKZKTZxmpi6TuMC+kxE9Ytl6/Br5IJhg0QcqZAUY06W |
| 35 |
A6X/s6n7XYboLXBiBg4c |
| 36 |
=N9w5 |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives