| 1 |
On 18/05/2015 20:21, Nuno Magalhães wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On the other hand, both btrfs and zfs will get you a level of data |
| 4 |
>> security that you simply won't get from ext4+lvm+mdadm - protection |
| 5 |
>> from silent corruption. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> That's one of the advantages i see in ZFS. Do you use it frequently? |
| 8 |
> Can anyone comment on its memory usage (without dedicated SSDs for |
| 9 |
> ARC)? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
ZFS needs a lot of memory to function well. It does work and run with |
| 13 |
far less memory than recommended, but doesn't run *well* - performance |
| 14 |
is impaired. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I don't recall the exact formula (insufficiently caffeinated at 8am) but |
| 17 |
8G is about your minimum for a decent storage device |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 24 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives