1 |
Am 15.12.2012 01:40, schrieb Mick: |
2 |
> On Thursday 13 Dec 2012 14:13:56 Bruce Hill wrote: |
3 |
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 08:44:45AM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
4 |
>>> NUMA is also an option in the kernel. Should also be fully transparent. |
5 |
>>> I got one machine with NUMA and only had to set an option for it. |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> Does anyone know how to check it's working properly? |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> dmesg | grep NUMA |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Hmm ... it seems that it can't find NUMA configuration: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> $ dmesg | grep UMA |
14 |
> No NUMA configuration found |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Am I supposed to configure something in userspace? This is what the kernel |
17 |
> has: |
18 |
> |
19 |
> $ uname -a |
20 |
> Linux dell_xps 3.5.7-gentoo #2 SMP PREEMPT Mon Nov 26 10:36:47 GMT 2012 x86_64 |
21 |
> Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 720 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux |
22 |
> |
23 |
[...] |
24 |
|
25 |
"dell_xps" as in XPS laptop? There are no NUMA laptops. |
26 |
|
27 |
Despite all the stuff about terminology, we are basically talking about |
28 |
multi-socket systems. Things with mainboards like these [1] as opposed |
29 |
to these [2]. |
30 |
|
31 |
[1] http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131378 |
32 |
[2] http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131725 |
33 |
|
34 |
Regards, |
35 |
Florian Philipp |