From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] /usr/local/portage does not seem to have a valid PORTDIR structure. | ||
Date: | Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:07:16 | ||
Message-Id: | 20051107194633.41be24bc@krikkit.digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] /usr/local/portage does not seem to have a valid PORTDIR structure. by Nagatoro |
1 | On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:24:19 +0100, Nagatoro wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > > Something along the lines of |
4 | > > |
5 | > > My_P=$(P/beta/_beta} |
6 | > > |
7 | > > and use ${My_P} instead of ${P} throughout the ebuild. |
8 | > > |
9 | > > |
10 | > |
11 | > Or better look at |
12 | > http://dev.gentoo.org/~plasmaroo/devmanual/ebuild-writing/ |
13 | > |
14 | > since _beta is a recogniced suffix there should be built in methods to |
15 | > deal with it. |
16 | |
17 | _beta is a recognised suffix, beta is not. Actually, the above line |
18 | should be |
19 | |
20 | MyP=${P/_beta/beta} |
21 | |
22 | |
23 | -- |
24 | Neil Bothwick |
25 | |
26 | Virtue is it's own punishment. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] /usr/local/portage does not seem to have a valid PORTDIR structure. | Norberto Bensa <nbensa@×××.net> |