Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of MUA | ||
| Date: | Thu, 11 Aug 2016 05:29:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1786616.LUfJD4BSpp@peak | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of MUA by Philip Webb |
||
| 1 | On Wednesday 10 Aug 2016 15:21:54 Philip Webb wrote: |
| 2 | > 160810 Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 3 | > > I've been using KMail for many years. It suits me in many ways, |
| 4 | > > the most important being that I don't need to keep switching my hands |
| 5 | > > between mouse and keyboard. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > If that's your criterion, why not try Mutt ? |
| 8 | > I've been using it for c 20 years & have never wanted anything else. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | How does it display HTML in messages? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Rgds |
| 14 | Peter |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of MUA | Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of MUA | Todd Goodman <tsg@×××××××××.net> |
| [gentoo-user] Re: Choice of MUA | Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> |