| 1 |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Andrey Falko <ma3oxuct@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Andrey Vul <andrey.vul@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Falko <ma3oxuct@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> > |
| 8 |
>> > |
| 9 |
>> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Paul Hartman |
| 10 |
>> > <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 11 |
>> >> |
| 12 |
>> >> I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output: |
| 13 |
>> >> |
| 14 |
>> >> $ emerge --info |
| 15 |
>> >> Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.3.2, |
| 16 |
>> >> glibc-2.8_p20080602-r0, 2.6.27-gentoo-r1 x86_64) |
| 17 |
>> >> ================================================================= |
| 18 |
>> >> System uname: |
| 19 |
>> >> |
| 20 |
>> >> |
| 21 |
>> >> Linux-2.6.27-gentoo-r1-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_CPU_6600_@_2.40GHz-with-glibc2.2.5 |
| 22 |
>> >> Timestamp of tree: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:31:02 +0000 |
| 23 |
>> >> |
| 24 |
>> >> Why does it show the glibc-2.8 on the second line but glibc2.2.5 on the |
| 25 |
>> >> fifth? |
| 26 |
>> >> |
| 27 |
>> >> Thanks, |
| 28 |
>> >> Paul |
| 29 |
>> >> |
| 30 |
>> > |
| 31 |
>> > My best guess is that your kernel was compiled by a toolchain that was |
| 32 |
>> > running on glibc2.2.5 |
| 33 |
>> > |
| 34 |
>> > See what happens if you recompile the kernel under the newer toolchain. |
| 35 |
>> > |
| 36 |
>> 2.6.27 uses glibc? Really? |
| 37 |
>> I'm asking lkml what's happening. |
| 38 |
>> |
| 39 |
>> |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
> Well it doesn't use glibc per se, gcc uses the glibc.....however, his uname |
| 42 |
> -a output does look funky. |
| 43 |
My point exactly. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
> Here is mine: System uname: 2.6.24.7 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6700 @ |
| 46 |
> 2.66GHz |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> Did all underscores make it there by accident? What happens when you do a |
| 49 |
> plain uname -a? |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
Here's my uname -a: Linux andrey 2.6.26.5-rt9 #6 PREEMPT RT Mon Oct 20 |
| 52 |
18:21:31 EDT 2008 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux |
| 53 |
But emerge --info | grep uname is this: System uname: |
| 54 |
Linux-2.6.26.5-rt9-i686-AMD_Athlon-tm-_XP_1700+-with-glibc2.0 |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
Clearly, the underscores and -with-glibc are part of portage 2.2_rc12. |
| 57 |
I'm going to scan through the portage _rc12.patch diff to see what's |
| 58 |
going on. |
| 59 |
Will report when finished. |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
-- |
| 63 |
Andrey Vul |
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. |
| 66 |
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
| 67 |
A: Top-posting. |
| 68 |
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? |
Archives