1 |
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Bill Longman <bill.longman@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 08/09/2010 01:08 PM, Robert Bridge wrote: |
4 |
> > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> >> There have been discussions on this list why sudo is a bad idea and sudo |
6 |
> on |
7 |
> >> *any* command is an even worse idea. You might as well be running |
8 |
> everything |
9 |
> >> as root, right? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > sudo normally logs the command executed, and the account which |
12 |
> > executes it, so while not relevant for single user systems, it STILL |
13 |
> > has benefits over running as root. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> ...excepting, of course, "sudo bash -l" which means you've given away |
16 |
> the keys to the kingdom. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I actually prefer "sudo su -" -- as long as I'm giving it away! :o) |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD |