1 |
Am Donnerstag 11 August 2011, 10:30:04 schrieb Mark Knecht: |
2 |
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > I'm testing this USB 3.0 bus-powered hard drive: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0041OSQ9S |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > and I get: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > # hdparm -tT /dev/sdb |
10 |
> > /dev/sdb: |
11 |
> > Timing cached reads: 8006 MB in 2.00 seconds = 4004.33 MB/sec |
12 |
> > Timing buffered disk reads: 252 MB in 3.01 seconds = 83.63 MB/sec |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > # hdparm -tT /dev/sdb |
15 |
> > /dev/sdb: |
16 |
> > Timing cached reads: 8230 MB in 2.00 seconds = 4116.54 MB/sec |
17 |
> > Timing buffered disk reads: 252 MB in 3.02 seconds = 83.55 MB/sec |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > # hdparm -tT /dev/sdb |
20 |
> > /dev/sdb: |
21 |
> > Timing cached reads: 8446 MB in 2.00 seconds = 4224.36 MB/sec |
22 |
> > Timing buffered disk reads: 230 MB in 3.02 seconds = 76.28 MB/sec |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > Wikipedia says USB 3.0 has transmission speeds of up to 5 Gbit/s. |
25 |
> > Doesn't MB/sec denote mega*bytes* per second? |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > - Grant |
28 |
> |
29 |
> 4000MB/s = 4Gb/s |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
please read man hdparm |
33 |
|
34 |
-T Perform timings of cache reads for benchmark and comparison purposes. |
35 |
For meaningful results, this operation |
36 |
should be repeated 2-3 times on an otherwise inactive system (no |
37 |
other active processes) with at least a couple |
38 |
of megabytes of free memory. This displays the speed of reading |
39 |
directly from the Linux buffer cache without |
40 |
disk access. This measurement is essentially an indication of |
41 |
the throughput of the processor, cache, and mem- |
42 |
ory of the system under test. |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
as you can see, those numbers have nothing to do with the transport. |
46 |
|
47 |
And 80mb/sec for a harddisk is really, really good. |
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
#163933 |