| 1 |
On 15 Jan 2006, at 14:36, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sunday 15 January 2006 04:08, Stroller wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> I'd be very happy with a 95% success rate on spam detection, but |
| 6 |
>> obviously false positives are a Bad Thing. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Never tried it myself, but I've read many articles that say that |
| 9 |
> dspam is |
| 10 |
> a better filter than spamassassin, ... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam/ |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It does indeed seem very good, but again it requires training, which |
| 15 |
is something I'm trying to avoid in this instance. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Stroller. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives