1 |
On Sunday 28 Dec 2014 07:19:22 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On 28/12/2014 06:08, Gregory M. Turner wrote: |
3 |
> > On Saturday 27 December 2014 09:43:47 Peter Humphrey wrote: |
4 |
> >> Morning list, |
5 |
> >> |
6 |
> >> Is there a way to build KDE without its concept of Activities? I find it |
7 |
> >> an unnecessary complication, which I never use. Any time I found myself |
8 |
> >> wrestling with it by accident it's caused little other than anger and |
9 |
> >> frustration. |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> >> No doubt this is just as silly an idea as building KMail without its |
12 |
> >> database, which also has caused considerable grief. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > +1 |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > Don't understand it. Don't want to. Really hate when I press the wrong |
17 |
> > button, it does some crazy inscrutable bullshit, and I have to figure out |
18 |
> > how to escape from it with my desktop intact. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Probably I just want to check my email, or whatever, and all of a sudden, |
21 |
> > it's like some ridiculous bridge troll is posing riddles to me and |
22 |
> > threatening to blow up my desktop if I answer wrong. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > After quickly ducking this, I'm not optimistic. This is particularly |
25 |
> > discouraging: https://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=91160 |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > Sounds an awful lot like the cashew/virtuoso/etc. If history is any |
28 |
> > guide, they'll never change it, no matter how nicely we ask, nor how |
29 |
> > carefully we construct the patches to make it optional. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> You can't build KDE without activities as far as I can tell, like a |
32 |
> poster said in the link you provided it's a core feature much like tabs |
33 |
> in Firefox. You can't "just remove that code" and still have stuff work. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> What you can do is make Activities go away and never impinge on your |
36 |
> life, that's what I do. I've had KDE here for years and like you never |
37 |
> grokked what it even is when it first hit early in 4.x. I'm a grumpy old |
38 |
> far, I like my 6 virtual desktops in 2 rows of three, I like to launch |
39 |
> the apps myself I known I'm going to use now, and I like global session |
40 |
> management for apps I always use all the time (like Konsole). I don't |
41 |
> like Activities. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> I made them go away and have been using the same KDE config ever since |
44 |
> quite happily. IIRC all it really took was to remove the icon[1] from |
45 |
> the panel, and maybe disable some keyboard shortcuts. Activities hasn't |
46 |
> appeared here for years now, I'd forgotten all about them till this |
47 |
> thread showed up :-) |
48 |
> |
49 |
> |
50 |
> Anyway, hope this helps |
51 |
> |
52 |
> |
53 |
> [1] The icon is the one with three small overlapping circles IIRC |
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
I seem to recall that Fedora introduced some button/patch/whatever to remove |
57 |
or at least hide the desktop toolkit that provides Activities. I don't know |
58 |
if this was back when, or it is still current. |
59 |
|
60 |
I can see a use case for Activities, when the user undertakes consistently |
61 |
repetitive tasks which involve the same tools, files and widgets, in the same |
62 |
virtual desktop configuration. In my case the only applications that I use |
63 |
reliably are a multi-tabbed terminal and a mail client. Everything else |
64 |
pretty much 'depends' and invariably I would use it in parallel with my |
65 |
terminal, rather than instead of. |
66 |
|
67 |
I can see though that someone more disciplined than me, who thinks along the |
68 |
lines of one task at a time, would probably have use for dekstop Activities. |
69 |
|
70 |
I have commented before about the disappointment that the KDE4 application |
71 |
design has been for me, in terms of KDEPIM. Since I don't use the KDE desktop |
72 |
on my main machine, things like activities don't bother me. |
73 |
|
74 |
-- |
75 |
Regards, |
76 |
Mick |