1 |
J. Roeleveld <joost <at> antarean.org> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Monday, June 13, 2016 02:10:27 PM James wrote: |
5 |
> > wabe <wabenbau <at> gmail.com> writes: |
6 |
> > Still, if you manage 1000 linux workstations, then systemd does have |
7 |
> > it's merits. |
8 |
|
9 |
> Serious question: What makes systemd more suitable to manage 1000 linux |
10 |
> workstations when compared to, for instance, OpenRC? |
11 |
|
12 |
> Joost |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
Seriously? |
16 |
(note:: awkward position for me to defend systemd....) |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
Because RHEL says so? Why else would they promote systemd? |
20 |
|
21 |
Because It's what bloggers say that make systemd the Kool_aid of choice |
22 |
these days? |
23 |
|
24 |
Because really, I was just being polite and trying very hard to say |
25 |
something nice about systemd? |
26 |
|
27 |
Because Jim Morrison told me systemd is the way to nirvana, in a 60s laden |
28 |
pipe dream? |
29 |
|
30 |
Because, if you are not promoting systemd, you are just not Quool....? |
31 |
|
32 |
Because, resistance, defined as the counterflow to Systemd flux, |
33 |
is futile? Reflectance is defined as the summation of your futile resistance |
34 |
area, under the curve. The endpoint being when you finally addopted |
35 |
(integrated) systemd into your hopes and dreams? |
36 |
|
37 |
Because cross-dressing the linux systems you manage, with different, custom |
38 |
scripts, is so 2010. We all need to wear the emperor's new clothes, to be |
39 |
hip, just like lennertd ? |
40 |
|
41 |
Because the NSA is funding systemd, and those that do not cooperate, will be |
42 |
barred from all GSA and large corporate contracts? |
43 |
|
44 |
Because Big, Corporate management believes that systemd will enable them to |
45 |
replace seasoned linux admins with mindless drones from the labor pool? |
46 |
(Note::Management is always the first to 'drink the Kool_aide' from other |
47 |
large, corporate vendors)? You do not want to know what else they do, after |
48 |
guzzling the kool_aide..... |
49 |
|
50 |
Because, I think we all know that I'm no whiz at systemd, actually far from |
51 |
it; in fact I'll be a very late adopter (perhaps post mortem as they inject |
52 |
me with embedded linux micro-nomes on my way to an oceanic burial)? |
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
So, one of the common arguments you here is that Systemd can standardize |
56 |
management across different linux distros. If fact many promote systemd |
57 |
based on a standardization track, as a really good idea. So in a large |
58 |
installation, it provides the inter-intra-system discipline thereby reducing |
59 |
the tendency of admins to create fiefdoms (via unique scripts) within the |
60 |
different machines that different admins manage ( vs traditional divide and |
61 |
conquer strategies). |
62 |
|
63 |
Perhaps a workshop or conference is a good idea, should you want the latest, |
64 |
expert advice on systemd [1]; just pay attention to the "no smoking signs" |
65 |
posted near the kool_aid punch-bowl. |
66 |
|
67 |
(liar liar, hair on fiar) -- da doors, resurrection tour. |
68 |
|
69 |
|
70 |
[1] http://0pointer.net/blog/ |
71 |
|
72 |
|
73 |
it's been great fun defending systemd! |
74 |
James |