1 |
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Bringing kde-meta up to version 3.5.6 is going to want to upgrade ALL it's |
5 |
> dependencies to 3.5.6 (which includes kate). |
6 |
> |
7 |
> To maintain different versions of of the various KDE packages, you'll need |
8 |
> to |
9 |
> remove the kde-meta package. To make sure 'emerge -u world' (or a |
10 |
> variant), |
11 |
> pulls in new version of other packages, you'll want to 'emerge -n' the |
12 |
> various direct dependencies of kde-meta (kdenetwork-meta etc). |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I doubt kate is a direct dependency of kde-meta (I could be wrong). If it |
15 |
> isn't, one (or more) of the other kde${stuff}-meta packages will also try |
16 |
> to |
17 |
> upgrade it. Instead of 'emerge -n'-ing those packages, 'emerge -n' it's |
18 |
> direct dependencies (one of which should be kate). |
19 |
> |
20 |
> You may actually find some packages that you don't care about, feel free to |
21 |
> not 'emerge -n' them. They will then not be updated by an 'emerge -u |
22 |
> world' |
23 |
> and my be removed be 'emerge --depclean' (unless they are a dependency of |
24 |
> some other package in world) |
25 |
> |
26 |
> In fact, I recently removed all the kde${stuff}-meta packages from my |
27 |
> system |
28 |
> and only installed the KDE applications I wanted. This might result in |
29 |
> significant disk space savings, but YMMV. I now have ~90 packages from the |
30 |
> kde-base category instead of the ~350 pulled in by kde-meta. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
Well, I am doing this the hard way right now. I just check for updates |
35 |
and update everything but kdelibs and kate manually. So far, so good. |
36 |
Maybe it will get sorted soon. |
37 |
|
38 |
Thanks |
39 |
|
40 |
Dale |
41 |
|
42 |
:-) :-) :-) :-) |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
www.myspace.com/dalek1967 |