1 |
I think we also ought to contact Linus, to have some input on what the |
2 |
forked-udev (vdev? gdev? nlpdev?) *shouldn't* be. Lest we tread the same |
3 |
path that led to him calling udev 'stupid'. |
4 |
|
5 |
Just my 2 cents. Probably worthless :-| |
6 |
|
7 |
Rgds, |
8 |
-- |
9 |
On Nov 13, 2012 4:26 PM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
10 |
|
11 |
> Michael Hampicke wrote: |
12 |
> > Am 13.11.2012 04:20, schrieb Dale: |
13 |
> >> |
14 |
> >> -------- Original Message -------- |
15 |
> >> Subject: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization |
16 |
> >> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:40:53 -0500 |
17 |
> >> From: Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> |
18 |
> >> Reply-To: gentoo-project@l.g.o |
19 |
> >> To: gentoo-project@l.g.o |
20 |
> >> |
21 |
> >> |
22 |
> >> Richard Yao wrote: |
23 |
> >> |
24 |
> >>> Dear Everyone, |
25 |
> >>> |
26 |
> >>> It is no secret that many of us are unhappy with the direction that |
27 |
> udev |
28 |
> >>> has taken under the leadership of the systemd developers. That includes |
29 |
> >>> Linus Torvalds, who is 'leery of the fact that the udev maintenance |
30 |
> >>> seems to have gone into some "crazy mode" where they have made changes |
31 |
> >>> that were known to be problematic, and are pure and utter stupidity.' |
32 |
> >>> |
33 |
> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/505 |
34 |
> >>> |
35 |
> >>> After speaking with several other Gentoo developers that share Linus' |
36 |
> >>> concerns, I have decided to form a team to fork udev. Our plan is to |
37 |
> >>> eliminate the separate /usr requirement from our fork, among other |
38 |
> >>> things. We will announce the project later this week. |
39 |
> >>> |
40 |
> >>> I understand that the council is scheduled to vote on a topic related |
41 |
> to |
42 |
> >>> udev stabilization. Would it be possible to delay the vote for another |
43 |
> >>> month so that we have time to get organized? |
44 |
> >>> |
45 |
> >>> Yours truly, |
46 |
> >>> Richard Yao |
47 |
> >>> |
48 |
> >> Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !! Me, |
49 |
> I'm looking forward to seeing how this works and giving it a test run when |
50 |
> it gets ready. Since it is a fork, shouldn't be to long, I hope. |
51 |
> >> |
52 |
> >> I wonder what they will name it tho. |
53 |
> >> |
54 |
> >> Dale |
55 |
> >> |
56 |
> >> :-) :-) |
57 |
> >> |
58 |
> > What about gdev (gentoo dev) :) |
59 |
> > |
60 |
> > |
61 |
> |
62 |
> That could work but since Linus thinks it is stupid the way udev is |
63 |
> headed, I was thinking about smartdev. That would be the opposite of |
64 |
> stupiddev I guess. lol |
65 |
> |
66 |
> I don't care what the name is, I just hope it works out not only for |
67 |
> Gentoo but for other distros that don't like the direction udev is going. |
68 |
> |
69 |
> Thanks to Richard and everyone else who is going to be working on this. |
70 |
> |
71 |
> Dale |
72 |
> |
73 |
> :-) :-) |
74 |
> |
75 |
> -- |
76 |
> I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
77 |
> how you interpreted my words! |
78 |
> |
79 |
> |
80 |
> |