| 1 |
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:29 AM Grant Taylor < |
| 2 |
gtaylor@×××××××××××××××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 8/12/20 11:53 AM, Никита Степанов wrote: |
| 5 |
> > which filesystem is best for raid 0? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Performance wise, ext4 and XFS lead most benchmarks for non-raid. XFS seems |
| 9 |
best for raid1, so I imagine either of those would be best for raid0. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Depends on your use case, but ext2 (and to a much lesser degree btrfs) will |
| 12 |
be less reliable than ext4 or XFS so what you use will depend on |
| 13 |
speed/reliability trade off. ext2 is less reliable due to it missing the |
| 14 |
journal, btrfs due to being less mature (IMO, this is a weakly held |
| 15 |
belief). Also btrfs tends to be slower than ext4 and XFS for most |
| 16 |
operations, sometimes by a large margin. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux-50-filesystems&num=2 |
Archives