1 |
Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > you're running a firewall of some kind (and you'd be crazy not to for |
4 |
> > any publically accessible box), |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Actually, I'd disagree. If only the necessary publicly accessible |
7 |
> services |
8 |
> are running on a box, what good should a "firewal" (I suppose you mean |
9 |
> packet filter, like iptables) do? The only useful measure I can think |
10 |
> about, is to do rate limiting. But what else? |
11 |
|
12 |
Just to name a few: |
13 |
-permitting certain services for certain hosts (ip/mac based) |
14 |
-time/cpu-load based restriction on certain services |
15 |
-filtering malformed/fragmented packets |
16 |
-implementing port-knocking feature |
17 |
-statistical evaluation of traffic (ip/protocol/service based) |
18 |
etc. |
19 |
|
20 |
All of the above mentioned is probably possible to do using |
21 |
different method, but why not use iptables for it? |
22 |
|
23 |
Jarry |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*! |
29 |
"Feel free" mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl |
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |