Re: [gentoo-user] gummibootx64.efi OR bootx64.efi?

[German]

On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German <gentgerman@×××××.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> > Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German <gentgerman@×××××.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot partition and found two .efi
> > > files. One is /boot/efi/gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi and another is
> > > /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi. I remember I've created
> > > /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi during install by copying kernel image file
> to
> > > it and supposedly it was for efibootmng. I think gummiboot has created
> its
> > > own gummibootx64.efi. Is that safe to delete */boot/bootx64.efi? Thanks
> > >
> > > They are the same image; do an md5sum of both, you'll see that they have
> > > the same checksum.
> > >
> > > I believe Boot/BOOTX64.EFI is the default location where the "BIOS" (or
> > > whatever is called in UEFI systems) looks for an image to boot,
> > > and gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi is just a copy. I'm not sure, but I would
> > > not delete it:
> >
> > gummiboot creates both copies of the file.
> >
> > Well, no, I have created */boot/bootx64.efi manually and
> */gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi was created by gummiboot install.
>
> In my machines boot/bootx64.efi was created by gummiboot, and it's the same
> ile as gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi (same checksum).
>
> What does bootctl says?

bootctl: command not found. How to use bootctl?
>
> Regards.
> --
> Canek Peláez Valdés
> Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias
> Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México


-- 
German <gentgerman@×××××.com>