Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: David Haller <gentoo@×××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Seagate ST8000NM0065 PMR or SMR plus NAS SAS SATA question
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 15:40:38
Message-Id: 20200523153940.p5v7gvjgd2kokwez@grusum.endjinn.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Seagate ST8000NM0065 PMR or SMR plus NAS SAS SATA question by Michael
1 Hello,
2
3 On Sat, 23 May 2020, Michael wrote:
4 >On Saturday, 23 May 2020 00:31:48 BST Rich Freeman wrote:
5 >> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 5:40 PM antlists <antlists@××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
6 >> > On 22/05/2020 19:23, Rich Freeman wrote:
7 >> > > A big problem with drive-managed SMR is that it basically has to
8 >> > > assume the OS is dumb, which means most writes are in-place with no
9 >> > > trims, assuming the drive even supports trim.
10 >> >
11 >> > I think the problem with the current WD Reds is, in part, that the ATA-4
12 >> > spec is required to support trim, but the ATA-3 spec is the current
13 >> > version. Whoops ...
14 >>
15 >> Probably was thought up by the same genius who added the 3.3V reset
16 >> pin to the SATA standard.
17 >
18 >Is there a way to determine if a drive on sale is SMR *before*
19 >purchase?
20
21 WD Red WD*EFRX are PMR.
22 WD Red WD*EFAX are SMR (AFAIK, could be, that some are PMR).
23
24 ISTR, that the "Red Pro" are all PMR (so far).
25
26 HTH,
27 -dnh
28
29 --
30 If I wanted to point and drool, I'd go to a Chippendales show.
31 -- Leigh Metcalf

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Seagate ST8000NM0065 PMR or SMR plus NAS SAS SATA question John Covici <covici@××××××××××.com>