| 1 |
Il giorno Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:36:28 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 |
james <wireless@×××××××××××.com> ha scritto: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Googling around, I get the impression |
| 5 |
> that 'grub' is now grub 2. Is that |
| 6 |
> correct? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> In portage I see grub-static |
| 9 |
> (GRUB Legacy boot loader) |
| 10 |
> with version numbers that coincide with |
| 11 |
> "grub" (grub2 ?). |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> If grub2 has replaced "grub-1" what (gentoo) |
| 14 |
> version number did grub2 first take take? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> What was the last (gentoo) version number for |
| 17 |
> grub 1 that was actually grub1 , or have I |
| 18 |
> confused these details? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I cannot seem to find these details in the release |
| 21 |
> notes or as part of the sourcecode. Any suggestions |
| 22 |
> on that would be keen. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> James |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
If I understand correctly your question, versions 0.9x are grub 1, while |
| 29 |
versions 1.9x are grub 2. You can also distinguish them according to their |
| 30 |
slots: grub 1 ebuilds have slot 0, while grub 2 ebuilds have slot 2. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Stefano |
Archives