1 |
Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin <at> googlemail.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> em, but you are already monitoring it! |
5 |
|
6 |
Maybe. It hard to tell if there are more than one |
7 |
temperature sensor, what buss interfacet they are on |
8 |
and if it is a calculated or esitmated or actual temperature |
9 |
sensor. |
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
> >> Does anyone with similar hardware have a more extensive list? |
13 |
> no, that is all you got. |
14 |
|
15 |
That's pretty sad. All that hardware and 3 temps.... |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
> >> What I'd really like is a very fast (real time?) gui to watch |
19 |
|
20 |
> you won't get that, because the senors don't update in 'realtime'. |
21 |
|
22 |
Sure. But if I knew of a relatively consistent delay semantic, |
23 |
I could align the delays in temperature sensing with what's going |
24 |
on with code compiling or execution; even if it is a rough estimate. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
> watch -n1 sensors. |
28 |
|
29 |
not bad. for quick checks. |
30 |
|
31 |
> Works even without systemd. Shocking, I know. |
32 |
|
33 |
As usual, your insight and singular wit makes for pleasurable reading. |
34 |
|
35 |
thx, |
36 |
James |