| 1 |
On 04/21/2010 01:26 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 21 April 2010 12:08:47 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 04/21/2010 12:59 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Tuesday 20 April 2010 16:41:03 Helmut Jarausch wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> On 20 Apr, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>>> On Dienstag 20 April 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>>>> Hi, |
| 8 |
>>>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>>>> has anybody experience with these new sys-kernel/ck-sources? |
| 10 |
>>>>>> I could only see they have additional patches (in addition to those |
| 11 |
>>>>>> of gentoo-sources). |
| 12 |
>>>>>> But I didn't find which patches and why these have only been applied |
| 13 |
>>>>>> to ck-sources? |
| 14 |
>>>>>> |
| 15 |
>>>>>> Thanks for your opinion, |
| 16 |
>>>>>> Helmut. |
| 17 |
>>>>> |
| 18 |
>>>>> if you have more than 2 cores, you shouldn't use them ;) |
| 19 |
>>>> |
| 20 |
>>>> Why, it's said to scale well up to 16 cores (at least)? |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>>> Does ck-sources apply the bfs patches? |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> Yes. Though it applies everything, not just BFS, and I'm not sure if |
| 25 |
>> this a good idea or not. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> How is ck-sources different from zen-sources? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
ck-sources only applies CK's patches. |
Archives