1 |
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> /* devices that don't properly handle queued TRIM commands */ |
3 |
> Micron_M500* |
4 |
> Crucial_CT*M500* |
5 |
> Micron_M5[15]0* |
6 |
> Crucial_CT*M550* |
7 |
> Crucial_CT*MX100* |
8 |
> Samsung SSD 8* |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
As somebody pointed out on Slashdot, this is basically all the models |
12 |
that otherwise seem to perform really well. |
13 |
|
14 |
The flip side of this is that nobody can really say that other models |
15 |
of drives aren't on the list because they actually work, vs not being |
16 |
on the list because nobody has bothered to test them extensively |
17 |
enough to detect a problem. |
18 |
|
19 |
Also, I believe they're trying to be conservative with the |
20 |
black-listing. There could very well be drives that aren't affected |
21 |
that match these patterns, and I believe this is supposed to get |
22 |
sorted out once the drive vendors get their acts together. |
23 |
|
24 |
Also, I don't know which stable kernels have the blacklist. It |
25 |
doesn't look like this list is in 3.18.14 which is the most recent |
26 |
longterm in Gentoo (3.18.15 is out but not yet in gentoo-sources). I |
27 |
went ahead and disabled fstrim and discard in the meantime. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Rich |