| 1 |
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:48:59PM -0700, Penguin Lover Richard Fish squawked: |
| 2 |
> On 8/17/06, Willie Wong <wwong@×××××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 3 |
> >Any ideas? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Since udev is seeing the events, I'm guessing something in your udev |
| 6 |
> rules. Have you done an etc-update? Anything relevant in |
| 7 |
> /etc/udev/rules.d/10-local.rules? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Yes, I've always performed the etc-update after upgrading udev. The |
| 11 |
only line in 10-local is the following: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-------/etc/udev/rules.d/10-local.rules----------- |
| 14 |
KERNEL=="js*", NAME="input/%k", MODE="664", SYMLINK+="%k" |
| 15 |
--------end file---------------------------------- |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
which is to make joysticks work under wine. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The thing is, I compared the rules (50-udev.rules) between three |
| 20 |
versions of udev, and to my eyes, the rules for sd* and sg* are |
| 21 |
virtually identical for these versions: |
| 22 |
1) udev-068-r1, which works on my desktop. |
| 23 |
2) udev-087-r1, the one that was giving me woes |
| 24 |
3) udev-094, one that is running on my ~x86 laptop and also works |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
So I am not quite sure whether it is a rules problem or a problem on |
| 27 |
how udev handles the events. Is there a way to check that? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
W |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
"`Right,' said Ford, `I'm going to have a look.' |
| 32 |
He glanced round at the others. |
| 33 |
`Is no one going to say, "No you can't possibly, let me go |
| 34 |
instead"?' |
| 35 |
They all shook their heads. |
| 36 |
`Oh well.'" |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
- Ford attempting to be heroic whilst being seiged by |
| 39 |
Shooty and Bangbang. |
| 40 |
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 22 days, 17:19 |
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives