| 1 |
On 161024-22:27+0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon Oct 24 15:49:09 2016, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Why not just share everything via bind mounts in this case? I'd think |
| 4 |
> > that would have less overhead than rsync/http and then you're not |
| 5 |
> > storing files twice. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Because I have several host boxes and I build the packages on only one. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I used to have 3 (even 4) same-hardware machines (well same MBO really) |
| 10 |
in daily use, and the local mirror is not an overkill long run. And if |
| 11 |
you look for security, then also Air-Gapping and cloning is a perfect |
| 12 |
solution, because you get a clean clone for online with an Air-Gapped |
| 13 |
that does not see online... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Some peple like rather btrfs ... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I had written a lot about Air-Gapped and cloning on the Forums, but |
| 18 |
maybe moderators would call it "blogging" if I gave you the link. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
btrfs I never used OTOH. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Miroslav Rovis |
| 24 |
Zagreb, Croatia |
| 25 |
http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr |
Archives