Archives
Archives
| From: | James Ausmus <james.ausmus@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB mass storage device slow in Gentoo, fast in Windows...? [SOLVED] | ||
| Date: | Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:35:07 | ||
| Message-Id: | b79f23071001051234g1fd2c7fy664e8d9208033cf1@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB mass storage device slow in Gentoo, fast in Windows...? [SOLVED] by "Szénási István" |
||
| 1 | 2010/1/5 Szénási István <szeist@×××××.com> |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > And what about the BFS scheduler? I know, that it isn't in the |
| 4 | > mainline kernel, bit I've heard a lot of good about that. |
| 5 | > If you send me the size and the number of the test files, I'll make an |
| 6 | > other benchmark with the CFQ, the Deadline and the BFS scheduler on a |
| 7 | > Dual Core machine. :-) |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | BFS is a CPU scheduler, CFQ, Deadline, No-Op, and Anticipatory are all I/O |
| 11 | schedulers... |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -James |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | > -- |
| 17 | > Szénási István |
| 18 | > |
| 19 | > |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB mass storage device slow in Gentoo, fast in Windows...? [SOLVED] | "Szénási István" <szeist@×××××.com> |