Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Dmitry S. Makovey" <dmitry@××××××××××.ca>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libgsf weirdness...
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:45:16
Message-Id: 200507181337.55001.dmitry@athabascau.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] libgsf weirdness... by "Tero Grundström"
1 On July 18, 2005 11:23 am, Tero Grundström wrote:
2 > > This is because gnumeric REQUIRES =1.10.0... and when you do a
3 > > -uD it will be upgraded.
4 > >
5 > > You should keep using -uNp instead of -uDNp ;)
6 >
7 > I wouldn't throw away -uDNp just because of this.
8 >
9 > On my system there are only two packages that depend on libgsf:
10 >
11 > gnumeric =gnome-extra/libgsf-1.10*
12 > librsvg >=gnome-extra/libgsf-1.6
13 >
14 > So librsvg can survive with an libgsf version as old as 1.6.
15 >
16 > My solution has been adding these lines to
17 > /etc/portage/package.mask: =gnome-extra/libgsf-1.12.0
18 > =gnome-extra/libgsf-1.12.1
19
20 I would lean towards abovementioned solution as it is 1) gentoo-way :)
21 2) is not destructive and if something requires higher version of
22 libgsf it'll complain about masked package and I can deal with it
23 then.
24
25 Thanks for usefull tip... Live and learn as they say :)
26
27 --
28 Dmitry Makovey
29 Web Systems Administrator
30 Athabasca University
31 (780) 675-6245